2017-10-12 12:03 GMT+02:00 Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com>: > > > On 10/10/17 22:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> yes, I don't think it was a good idea to make so many pages which all >> contain definitions for the same tag. The key definition page is OK, but >> the "Aeroways" page would have sense tp explain the concepts, give >> background information, etc., but it shouldn't be a mere replication of the >> aeroway key page. If we don't have anything to say compared to what should >> be on the key page, then we could consider removing the page alltogether. >> > > Please don't do that. Having read all of the aeroway related wiki pages > the Aeroways page is the best written of them. Based on the discussion > pages it's also the primary page.
before removing it, we should merge the content to the other pages of course. I'm not saying it has to be removed, but if the only purpose is defining tags, rather than giving an overview or summary, then this content should go to key and tag definition pages. The primary page for tag definitions should be tag definition pages, and there shouldn't be conflicting information on overview pages. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
