You're welcome! I understand that the lanes method is time-consuming. Alternatively, you could skip the three lines section as it is rather short. Then you would just have to split the road way twice and copy-paste the tags. I think this is even faster than drawing and tagging two additional ways.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:15 Dave Swarthout, <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wow, thanks for the help, Markus. I really appreciate it. > > But I must say, if I have to use that method to tag all the turnouts on > the Sterling Highway, I'm going to leave them unmapped. Life is too short > and there is a lot of other mapping yet to do in Alaska. > > Although these lanes are not physically separated by a barrier other than > a painted line, I'm going to opt for the service road scenario. It is > simple, much, much less error prone to map, and IMHO, would do the job > better than the lanes technique. > > Thanks to all, > > Dave > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 6:51 PM SelfishSeahorse <selfishseaho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 11:17, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I'm still not convinced the lanes:smv tagging scenario is the best >> solution but were I to change my mind, how would I tag my turnouts? Here >> is another screen shot of the particular section of highway with a turnout >> on both sides of the road that I've been discussing (59.752103, -151.766395 >> ) with the ways removed for clarity: >> https://www.dropbox.com/s/nm6iahw9ch79tuh/slow_vehicle_turnout.jpg?dl=0 >> >> I would probably split the road at every place where an additional >> lane begins or ends, i.e. four times, and would tag the sections as >> follows from right to left (this is the direction of the highway way): >> >> lanes=2 >> >> lanes=3 >> lanes:forward=2 >> lanes:backward=1 >> smv:lanes:forward=|designated >> overtaking:lanes:forward=yes|no >> >> lanes=4 >> lanes:forward=2 >> lanes:backward=2 >> smv:lanes:forward=|designated >> smv:lanes:backward=|designated >> overtaking:lanes:forward=yes|no >> overtaking:lanes:backward=yes|no >> >> lanes=3 >> lanes:forward=1 >> lanes:backward=2 >> smv:lanes:backward=|designated >> overtaking:lanes:backward=yes|no >> >> lanes=2 >> >> In case the turnouts were separated by a barrier, i think your idea >> with highway=service + service=slow_vehicle_turnout would make sense. >> >> Regards >> Markus >> > > > -- > Dave Swarthout > Homer, Alaska > Chiang Mai, Thailand > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging