* Also, as have already been mentioned in other replies, there are various other differences between the two services other than number of wheels and whether they're enclosed.
在 2020年5月11日週一 09:04，Phake Nick <c933...@gmail.com> 寫道： > I am more thinking about analysis of geographical data of cities or > districts where taxi and motorcycle taxi would be two very different things > to be managed. > Even if you view it from the viewpoint of people trying to get a ride, I > would not expect cross-display of the two types of mobility items in the > same format as that would lose the meaning of having the two types of > mobility options. > > 在 2020年5月11日週一 08:58，Jarek Piórkowski <ja...@piorkowski.ca> 寫道： > >> On Sun, 10 May 2020 at 18:35, Phake Nick <c933...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > At the end of the day we are not taking motorcycle taxi and taxi >> themselves. What's being tagged are waiting area for taxi or motorcycle >> taxis. What matters is that, if one is created as an optional subtag of >> another, would not using such subtag result in incorrect analysis of data >> when someone use those data, and the answer seems to me as yes. >> >> Depends what question you're asking in the analysis, surely. >> >> If your question is "where can get a ride" then the results won't be >> wrong. >> >> If your question is "where can get a ride in an enclosed two-track >> vehicle" then the results would be wrong in Indonesia. But if you're >> asking that in Indonesia, you're probably also aware of the variety of >> local modes of transportation and realize that you should ask a more >> specific question. >> >> You could make a similar argument for other amenities. >> For example, if you're looking for a parking spot, and if your region >> some parking lots are private, you need to take that into account when >> doing the analysis. >> If you are looking for a rapid transit station and you're in a >> wheelchair, and in your area not all stations are accessible, you need >> to take that into account when doing the search. This might not occur >> to someone from an area where all stations are accessible, so should >> we have a railway=inaccessible_station rather than wheelchair=no to >> prevent incorrect analysis? >> >> To me, this argument goes back to the same question of whether an >> amenity=taxi is where you hire a ride, or where you hire a ride in an >> enclosed vehicle that can fit 2+ passengers and probably a bit of >> luggage. >> >> --Jarek >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
