sent from a phone

> On 8. Aug 2020, at 19:37, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Well, perhaps it is clear to you and I, but I found a number of 
> amenity=parking_space with capacity > 1 and no associated amenity=parking. 
> *Someone* is using it wrong :-).


yes, what I intended was that amenity=parking_space implies capacity=1, and any 
other capacity are not defined. The current scheme says you can add capacities 
for amenity=parking (but it will not tell you where these specific parking 
types are located within the parking), and you can add single parking spaces, 
one by one.


Cheers Martin 
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to