Re: status to indicate "was not voted upon but is widely used and most people are happy with it"
That's the "de facto" status. -- Joseph Eisenberg On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 6:09 AM Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Well, yes, voting "no" is probably not useful, but this is also the >> least "interesting" bit of the proposal. The purpose here would be just >> to bless the tag with "status=approved" rather than "status=de-facto". >> > > But it wasn't approved by a formal vote. If you mark it status=approved > then > it ought to be possible to find the vote that approved it. Maybe we need > a different status to indicate "was not voted upon but is widely used and > most people are happy with it" but we don't have that. Please don't > misuse "approved" to mean that. > > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
