sent from a phone
> On 7. Aug 2020, at 14:51, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> that’s almost 22k uses, it is already established and voting yes or no will >> not change it > > Well, yes, voting "no" is probably not useful, but this is also the least > "interesting" bit of the proposal. The purpose here would be just to bless > the tag with "status=approved" rather than "status=de-facto". unless the vote fails of course, which would bring us from a fairly defined situation that we have now, to limbo. > >>> - To allow mapping motorcycle parking as part of a unified parking >>> lot, by introducing parking_space=motorcycle and >>> capacity:motorcycle >> amenity=parking is defined for single parking spaces, adding capacity to >> what seems to be a subtag, would create confusion > > Huh? There is clearly some miscommunication happening here. sorry, I meant amenity=parking_space of course. Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
