It's almost never standard to use access=bus or access=taxi, it's bus=yes/no/designated + taxi=yes/no/designated added to another feature like a highway=* or amenity=parking
I agree with the idea of using private_hire=* instead of rideshare=* because this appears to be a proper British English term for any non-taxi, privately arranged transport vehicle, and it's not as misleading as "rideshare" when used on services like Uber and Lyft. Though I would like to see more British folks weigh in on the correct terminology. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxicabs_of_the_United_Kingdom#Private_hire_(minicabs) -- Joseph EIsenberg On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 10:51 AM Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonew...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually I quite like "private_hire" as an access value. > > > Are you suggesting access=private_hire as a tag? That would not be > consistent with how taxi services are tagged. We don't use access=taxi, we > use amenity=taxi + taxi=*. By that logic, the access tagging should use > private_hire=*, and probably with some value of amenity=. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
