Oct 12, 2022, 11:59 by martianfreeloa...@posteo.net: > > > On 12/10/2022 09:34, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> we do not need the historic key to be “approved”, it is already there, any >> definition we put in the wiki should reflect how the tags are actually used. >> Approving a definition that would make current tagging an “error” if it is >> completely introduced with many established and undisputed values, is just >> wasting everybody’s time, even more if the result would lead to >> “deprecation” of these established tags >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/historic#values >> <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/historic#values> >> > > So then what's the point of approving tags anyways? > main point would be review of tagging that can be still redefined as only few objects were mapped this benefit is lost for tags already widely used which cannot be redefined another benefit is confirming that some specific tagging is liked by community - but for very popular tags this is pointless whether deprecations are beneficial and how helpful are proposals here is an interesting topic, but it anyway does not apply here
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
