2009/9/24 Roy Wallace <waldo000...@gmail.com>: > Good method: Discussion, voting, observing tagwatch, making
So it's good that discussions end up going round in circles with no clear outcome? > Bad method: Doing (semi)-automated changes of other people's > contributions, which can often be *damaging* (in the eyes of the > author, at least) This is a strawman argument. The basis of OSM is that anyone can edit anything for any reason, as long as it's not infringing someone else's copyright and isn't malicious. Furthermore there is a lot of bots doing a number of various different things, obviously they haven't been banned so their edits must not be undesirable. If people had followed the recommendations of the map features page in the first place this wouldn't even be an issue. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
