On Thursday 27 December 2012 22:05:17 Glenn Plas wrote: > There is a simple rule I use, which is being used for certain in plenty > of countries like UK and described in the OSM wiki. A primary road is > a road that connects larger cities, so a N road between 2 small town > would be secondary. I think it matters that you look at the whole road > with the same reference. That is the cities you look at.
UK doesn't use a rule like that, they're even much more strict than us using road numbers... > How much traffic passes over it, doesn't really matter. For instance, > the N1 Mechelen-Brussel, someone tagged the part through Vilvoorde as > secondary. Since Mechelen, Vilvoorde and Brussel counts as a > connection through big cities plus, well ... It's number 1 of the > N-class roads. I haven't really checked the situation in Vilvoorde, but one of the "rules" is that within a city center, primary becomes secondary if there's a ringway that will connect to the other primary roads to the city. For example: http://osm.org/go/0Eg4Fgm N8 is secondary in Zwevegem, since the N391 was made to create a ringway around Zwevegem. http://osm.org/go/0EpYdO2L N1 crosses centre of Antwerp, but becomes secondary within the Singel. I guess someone did something similar in Vilvoorde with the R22. Whether that should be done, not really sure here. I also wanted to point at Tienen, but I see it has been recently changed by someone: http://osm.org/go/0EqQDB8 There's the N29 coming in from the north, and the N3/N29 should stay primary because there's no ringway on the north. Now someone changed it to secondary which is incorrect IMO. Ben _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be