I don't agree with that. Its necessary to have addr:street for every address. When you use potlatch on the computer or iLOE on your smartphone its easy to bring in new data or correct the data. The associated street is redundant (and as i saw in Bierbeek often wrong).
For me it is most important that new users have the possibility of introduce new data in a simple way (copy-paste the streetname in addr:street). Its a pity that most of the people here give only sophisticated solutions for very simple problems. If you don't make it easy for the contributors, you will never get addresses from then. 2013/1/7 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> > The associatedStreet relation has the streetname in 'name', not in > addr:street. I also found some relations where this was done incorrectly. > > It is possible to fix all of them in one go. Advise me if you want me to > do so. > > Polyglot > > > 2013/1/7 Joren <joren.libreoff...@telenet.be> > >> Op 07-01-13 00:35, Kurt Roeckx schreef: >> >> On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 03:23:15PM +0100, Sander Deryckere wrote: >>> >>>> The first thing you notice is that there are a lot of features with >>>> housenumber information, but without street information. While other >>>> information (such as city) can be determined from closed boundaries. >>>> It's >>>> often ambiguous and hard to determine the street from other OSM >>>> features. >>>> >>> Osmose counts alot of errors in Belgium because of that. See: >>> http://osmose.openstreetmap.**fr/errors/graph.png?country=**belgium<http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/errors/graph.png?country=belgium> >>> >> http://tools.geofabrik.de/**osmi/?view=addresses&lon=4.** >> 41356&lat=51.10370&zoom=14&**baselayer=Geofabrik&opacity=1.** >> 00&overlays=no_addr_street,**street_not_found<http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=4.41356&lat=51.10370&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik&opacity=1.00&overlays=no_addr_street,street_not_found> >> >> Geofabrik shows that there are many 'bugs' in the city 'Reet' ... but >> when I examine it, some/all houses are tagged with 'associatedStreet >> <streetname>, etc'... >> Is this the correct tagging, or do we need to delete that tag, and tag >> them with 'addr:street'? >> >> >> >>> About 50% of those are because of missing addr:street or >>> associatedStreet relation. >>> >>> It would in general be a good thing that we try and fix all those >>> errors. >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >> Joren >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-be<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
