On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 07:49:55PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:04:56PM +0200, Glenn Plas wrote: > > http://www.vlaamsbrabant.be/binaries/kaart-vlaamsbrabant-fusiegemeenten-deelgemeenten_tcm5-11555.pdf > > That's not even complete. For instance Haacht exists of Haacht, > Wespelaar, Tildonk, Wakkerzeel en Kelfs. You can find signs on > the streets for all 5 of them. There exists statistics about > people living in all 5 of them, birthrates, ... So there clearly > is some definition of what those 5 are. But I've never seen a > map clearly saying where the borders are like they are now. > > If you look at the map as produced by province, Wakkerzeel and > Kelfs seem to be part of Tildonk now. > > Historically, Kelfs used to be part of Herent and Wakkerzeel > used to be part of Werchter. If you combine old and new borders > you might be able to define where those are. I have some old > maps, but I'm not sure they are detailed enough to put the borders > like they really are.
Anyway, I added Werchter based on what I know about it. It might not be really correct, but I think it's good enough. Kurt _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
