On 06/15/2013 02:08 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 07:49:55PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:04:56PM +0200, Glenn Plas wrote:
http://www.vlaamsbrabant.be/binaries/kaart-vlaamsbrabant-fusiegemeenten-deelgemeenten_tcm5-11555.pdf
That's not even complete. For instance Haacht exists of Haacht,
Wespelaar, Tildonk, Wakkerzeel en Kelfs. You can find signs on
the streets for all 5 of them. There exists statistics about
people living in all 5 of them, birthrates, ... So there clearly
is some definition of what those 5 are. But I've never seen a
map clearly saying where the borders are like they are now.
I did realise it's a best effort situation. And I just shared the best
I could find, at no point this was being presented as being complete or
accurate.
Anyway, I added Werchter based on what I know about it. It might
not be really correct, but I think it's good enough.
That's probably the best one can do given the circumstances. It seems
to me that it's something Rotselaar doesn't care about, if you want to
know the borders of Bonheiden vs Rijmenam (I'm from this area too btw),
it's on the website (see
http://www.bonheiden.be/file_uploads/2192.pdf?_vs=0_n )
They do seem to care, I cannot find this concerning werchter. Now
googling for 'werchter' is kind of a problem as it pops up nothing but
irrelevant 'festivalitis' links.
I'll take a look at what's been added, have a pretty good idea myself
what it should be like.
Glenn
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
