http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/214462
There it is 8? Maybe I'm overlooking something.... On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Daan Bellefroid <d...@idaan.be> wrote: > But in the change, Werchter is given admin_level 8. I think it has to be > changed. > > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Ben Laenen <benlae...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sunday 16 June 2013 19:02:01 Glenn Plas wrote: >> > Kurt (a.o), >> > >> > I checked the Rotselaar/Werchter setup and I made a single change to the >> > Rotselaar relation: >> > >> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/214462 >> > >> > The only thing I think was missing is adding the Werchter boundary >> > relation as a 'subarea' to the Rotselaar one. >> > >> > Did the same setup for Rijmenam/Bonheiden. There aren't many >> > 'fusiegemeentes' being mapped -unfortunately- although it would be >> > highly interesting to have them, not only from a nominatim (search) >> > point of view, but also for addressing in general. >> > >> > The change I made will probably trigger some changes in the nominatim >> > search result in a few days , I now expect that Leuven will be replaced >> > by Rotselaar in the search result set when looking up Werchter in a few >> > days. >> >> Don't think it'll make nominatim process it differently; it gets it input >> from >> the admin_level and adds each different admin_level to the list it shows >> (9 = >> Werchter, 8 = Rotselaar, 7 = Leuven, 6 = Vlaams Brabant, 4 = Flanders, 2 = >> Belgium. Btw, you don't have to wait a few days for it to update, it >> updates a >> few minutes after uploading your edits. >> >> Ben >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
