The areas I'm working with are very large (for the bus routes). Now the autosaves take 15-20 seconds (on SSD). That will change when all the adresses will have been added. But maybe it will change anyway. AS relations or not. I'll find a solution, no problem.
The problem is rather that when all the addresses in say Europe will have been added and we're not careful with diskspace, it will have become impossible for people like you and me to work with all that data as a whole. But, as I said, I was going to rest my case. Jo 2013/11/18 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> > I'm using autosave as well, don't see the problems that you encounter. > Perhaps you have much larger changesets ? :-) Does autosave write > everything ? Or only the things that are changed ? Just curious to pinpoint > the exact cause of the long autosaves you encounter. > > m > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'll rest my case for the associatedStreet relation. I was indeed talking >> about mobile editors like Vespucci or iLoE, not something like OsmAND, >> which does preprocess the data. >> >> I won't stop adding them myself every once in a while, but that won't >> change much, as adresses are not what I'm concentrating on, even though >> they are, of course, important. >> >> To be able to keep things workable once all those adresses will be added, >> I'll find a way to purge them from the dataset locally after each >> download... Can't live without autosave, but it's annoying it interrupts >> the workflow for longer and longer amounts of time. >> >> My preference is to do things in an efficient way, but we don't do that >> for other things either. >> >> Jo >> >> >> >> >> 2013/11/18 Ben Abelshausen <ben.abelshau...@gmail.com> >> >>> Processing addresses in my opinion has to be smart enough to handle >>> all this. When I process OSM-data for mobile devices everything is removed >>> that is not useful and I would hope other software is also smart enough to >>> keep only the data it needs. I don't know of any mobile app that consumes >>> OSM-data in it's raw form, except maybe some of the mobile editors. >>> >>> Mostly the arguments in favor of the associatedStreet relation are >>> related to technology, the arguments against are the fact that OSM is more >>> than a collection of hackers trying to build a map. >>> These technology arguments are things that can be solved either way and I >>> think we have enough people that can do this kind of stuff. >>> >>> The thing we really need are more mappers and I don't think OSM should >>> become the kind of project where you would have to be an 'expert' to add a >>> simple address to the database. >>> >>> Met vriendelijke groeten, >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Ben Abelshausen >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Talk-be mailing list >>> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
