Hallo Karel,

Dat is niet helemaal hetzelfde. Bij car sharing mag je bepaalde rijstroken
gebruiken als je een passagier bij je hebt.

Autodelen zoals Cambio e.d. dat doen, is een vorm van 1 auto voor meerdere
mensen die een soort abonnement hebben en dan onderling afspreken wie de
wagen op welk moment ter beschikking heeft.

Misschien heb ik de Engelse term wel verkeerd. Ben wat vermoeid.

De data voor de plugin zit in een ticket van JOSM. Ik verwacht dat het er
dan morgen wel bij zal zitten.

Ik heb gezorgd dat we nu ook zones voor parkeren, parkeerverbod en alle
mogelijke beperkingen kunnen toevoegen. Verder alle gevaarsborden
toegevoegd en de meest relevante 'informatie'-borden.

Aan wegwijzers ben ik nog niet toegekomen.

En dan natuurlijk Sander z'n opmerkingen verwerkt.

Wie zelf de laatste borden wil toevoegen, of Franse vertalingen, of verdere
verbeteringen, be my guest:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium/Road_signs_pluginhttps://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42418402/RoadSignsBE/RoadSignsBE.zip
​​​​
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42418402/RoadSignsBE/roadsignpresetBE.xml

De iconen zitten er al allemaal in, ze moeten enkel aan dat XML-bestand
worden toegevoegd en dan zijn ze beschikbaar in de plugin. Wat tijd kost,
is uitzoeken welke tags er dan van toepassing zijn.

mvg,

Jo

2015-02-13 18:46 GMT+01:00 Karel Adams <fa348...@skynet.be>:

>  Op zijn minst bestaan er gereserveerde parkeerplaatsen.
> Voorbeeld aan station Nekkerspoel (Ontvoeringsplein).
>
> https://www.google.be/maps/@51.029946,4.489369,3a,30y,106.71h,86.96t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sJ2aKjl84Hyve3lEwG3UrVA!2e0?hl=nl
>
>
> On 13-02-15 17:03, Jo wrote:
>
> Do we have car sharing traffic rules in Belgium?
>
> 2015-02-13 14:56 GMT+01:00 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> 2015-02-11 16:17 GMT+01:00 Sander Deryckere <sander...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>>          I tried it a bit, and I do have some concerns with both the
>>> mapping plugin and the style JOSM uses.
>>>
>>>  First, I think that a traffic sign should only have tags like
>>>
>>>  traffic_sign=BE:C21[7]
>>>
>>>  and no tags like
>>>
>>>  maxweight=7
>>>
>>>  Those legal implications of traffic signs should stay on way segments
>>> IMO.
>>>
>>
>>  Fully agree with you, atm you can get the effect you want by ticking or
>> unchecking the tick box.
>>
>>
>>>  Then I've always had problem with tagging variable speed limits (f.e.
>>> those dynamic zone-30 signs). When mapping signs, there should be a clear
>>> difference between the variable sign and the fixed sign, and that setting
>>> should also apply to the tags on the way segments.
>>>
>>
>>  same here
>>
>>>
>>>  Since we're tagging directions on road pieces too, allowing direction
>>> signs (f.e. F29) should also be possible.
>>>
>>
>>  It's a matter of adding it to the XML file. Not hard to do, but it
>> hadn't been high on my priority list. The icons are already present in the
>> plugin's image files. One of the reasons I hadn't added them yet (apart
>> from lack of time), is that I'm concerned they will take up a lot of space,
>> so the plugin should be changed and have tabs for categories of signs.
>>
>>>
>>>  Now, wrt the specific Belgian case, I've also seen a few mistakes,
>>> though not that many, since the plugin isn't very usable before solving the
>>> above.
>>>
>>>  C9 is translated to moped=no on the wiki, while it's mofa=no on the
>>> plugin. I know the difference is very fuzzy (and the relation to class A
>>> and B too), but we should at least use a uniform tagging.
>>>
>>
>>  C9 seems to be meaningless if Class A or B are not mentioned. Changed
>> to moped.
>>
>>>
>>>  C23 is translated to goods=no on the wiki, and hgv=no on the plugin,
>>> again, the difference is rather fuzzy.
>>>
>>  added both
>>
>>>
>>>  C24a and C24b are both tagged as hazmat=no on the plugin, again a
>>> difference with the wiki, and I'm not sure what the hazmat_ADR_tunnel sign
>>> is.
>>>
>>
>>  conformed to the wiki, even though no information about
>> access:explosives can be found there
>>
>>>
>>>  Sign combinations (like C5+C7) also aren't available in the plugin.
>>>
>>
>>  Didn't readily know what to do with those. Added them now
>>
>>>
>>>  No-stopping signs are missing from the plugin, and no-parking signs
>>> have no tags attached (parking:lanes:right=no would be the default tag I
>>> guess).
>>>
>>
>>  Added, it's work in progress. I skipped the ones I didn't feel sure
>> enough about.
>>
>>>
>>>  The F1 sign (without buildings background) is deprecated and all need
>>> to be replaced against June 1st (see
>>> http://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20141120_01386508 as example), I don't
>>> think the plugin will be production-ready against that time. So I don't
>>> think it's worth to include the sign (at least not with that graphic).
>>>
>>
>>  Leaving it for the time being. Feel free to contribute a better graphic
>> for F1a.
>>
>>>
>>>  F9 should be translated to motorroad=yes instead of motorway=yes
>>>
>>
>>  changed
>>
>>>
>>>  The F17 sign contains some strange defaults (conditional access
>>> restrictions?)
>>>
>>
>>  copy pasted from wiki, I'll remove them.
>>
>>>
>>> I didn't really check the validity of sub-signs, as I've often found
>>> sub-signs very confusing in real life.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>  Thanks!!!
>>
>>  Jo
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing 
> listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to