Those are what I meant with sub-signs that often require free text input. But even that free text (next to the naming of the sign) can be horrible. And not only in Belgium. Just take a look at this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Conditional-access-bicycle-and-delivery.jpg
When you read the sign, it's unclear under which exception a pizza delivery boy falls under: either the delivery restrictions or the snor- and bromfiets restrictions. I don't expect pizza delivery boys to really obey any signs, but these ambiguous cases happen rather often, certainly for less common modes of transport. 2015-02-11 18:00 GMT+01:00 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com>: > I added those Type signs to the plugin, and I fully agree with you about > the spanking! I called them Type_XX_often_something_extra > > They're a pain and forced me to become somewhat creative... > > Jo > > 2015-02-11 17:44 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be>: > >> What are we going to do about Type-* subsigns ? That is the official >> designation, I mapped a few but they apply to several variations. I >> tried waiting until someone else brings them up. >> >> I'm talking about those: >> >> http://www.wegcode.be/wetteksten/secties/mb/mb-111076/868-hs2art13 >> >> Type IV for example : "Uitgezonderd bus" But it can also be >> "Uitgezonderd plaatselijk verkeer" >> >> So it's not deterministic at all and in fact you loose information. The >> person who thought of this naming scheme should be spanked. >> >> Glenn >> > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be