-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 28-07-16 21:42, Ruben Maes wrote: > Hi Glenn > > We can do away with the relation and make sure waterway=riverbank > is placed everywhere. But this has seemed always strange to me: for > canals as well? A canal is not a river, and the wiki on > waterway=riverbank says: "This describes the tagging scheme for > large rivers", linking to the Wikipedia page for river: "A river is > a natural flowing watercourse ..."
No , not for canals, when I researched this became pretty clear this was only meant for rivers. But the Leie is a river so it's ok here. > waterway=riverbank is less relation-fiddling and I'm starting to > see the advantages of that as well. I had to fix the Zenne so many times that I started to see the merits of this as well. I actually just discovered why this wasn't rendering in the first place, there is some overlaying going on. Check the relation 2393380 here: http://analyser.openstreetmap.fr/cgi-bin/index.py The top 2 yellow markers show you where there is a duplicate way and it's in the relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423643352 That small piece is preventing it from being rendered decently at the moment. If you want to take a stab at fixing it , go ahead. If you want me to review it later on, give me the headsup and I'll take a look. A bit short in time due to closing the books on the fiscal year of 2015. I hate fines :) Glenn > > On donderdag 28 juli 2016 21:19 Glenn Plas wrote: >> Hey Ruben, >> >>>> I do not see the merit of natural=water scheme at all on a >>>> river or a canal. It's a waterway. imho, there is nothing >>>> to migrate to. Unless I seriously missed something, the way >>>> to do it is the way (not the area) is the logical waterway. >>> >>> Both have disadvantages. They are equally hard to maintain. >> >> I disagree here. Riverbank is easy to maintain for me atleast, >> they should not be included in any relationship either, they >> should not be named and they do make sense on rivers where the >> waterlevel (and/or tides) influence the shape. [1] >> >> The logical riverway still belongs in the the 'waterway tagging >> scheme' if we can call it like that. >> >> natural=water isn't meant for rivers. I don't see where this >> idea is coming from at the moment. It's used on lakes, still >> water etc but on a river it's not suited. [2] The wiki doesn't >> mention that usage either. >> >> So the logical river would be waterway=river , and that is the >> part you would put in a waterway relation, the riverbank not. >> >> Keep things simple I would suggest. Hence the suggestion to >> delete the relation, probably have to review the tags first so we >> don't throw away good information. >> >> Now, I'm about to put the kids to bed so I really just scanned >> the wiki but I've done quite some research on waterway logic, >> hence why I'm quite convinced. But always open to suggestions. >> >> Glenn >> >> >> >> [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank >> [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater > > > > > _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing > list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXmmOJAAoJELTQZq3fHKRZxscP/RwzPDRAUyhOMBaGHzIoL4R4 YOgDqsMhqUUsIUQQJxVg8zOn2qpKM7OwRZyGSw1+QrG96h1SsAv1v8FeksWsM5t2 XuLqKN8FBhEWmPhMjSwvlS+yHMlEBnghmkfEjQHPGs1Y1JGv9G0l2oMFNBv5fdTm kGCA5uYqDbXjxnJRuSv1qGe/NMt0BwOmbDMYTPiNGPNEFxFa/OGN72rrgopUSPJH 9K8gKGsL3fqqFvcibPHc5TO7stUGRo0sjaxJdIEHtVoUd5ZOg+1tOY3KVcnWefTZ rk4HLk2y5qjsyYwsnFHc+GgURjS1QzRDqioVAjOWvQXuBGaWsBrYnO0JSgJXAyNl h9ShtFUnQ7NGbFWuRqPmpDyWJzliUMEBtAq/LgqdPUShf3fTEIcL19b9D/v+pPPw lJH1V1WzudJboQX2fDD4MqN2Heh3IatRYv5tb6LWkaoxt1SjkIR5gKCbR0KiM7Ve Fb3vKVv8xl58R6mEE2hF09PAp8QEtUnc8NxDNptylyfaniP9nUCM+/A+1vWn3leS 5+k2VNLWO4p3dXzP+2yUJlUrmBT46kOh4s9QvaEiumxeZJ7rrd2p3MeTfBz5UBEc Qz5XZrJ3Uhf5/jYOkwppFCm69fBI3eWjhjuFtYjSOlDlxNS7Fi4pLcMm4HMS5Utm 9ROn5Vn/iIVFOh5O5oy5 =hCmV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
