they were introduced to indicate the difference between the different type of pizzeria's in Italy. It makes no sense to have cuisine=italian in Italy
m. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Thomas Bertels <tbert...@gmail.com> wrote: > From https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/restaurant%3Atype%3Ait it seems > that those should be replaced by cuisine=italian etc. > > > Le 8/08/2017 à 05:48, Marc Gemis a écrit : >> >> ps. look at taginfo: >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=restaurant%3Atype >> reataurant:type:it is used 629 times. That was another source of >> inspiration for me. >> But it doesn't fit for amenity=pub. There is 1 pub:type:it though. >> >> m >> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> But unlike a real pub (a "café" in Dutch and French - or "bruine >>> kroeg"), you can get a decent meal in a brasserie, or ice cream, >>> pancakes around 4pm etc. So the focus is much more on food imho. >>> So are you suggesting that amenity=pub; food=yes is better ? >>> >>> the description tag is very general, but could be used. However, I >>> want something like the school:FR-tag. I believe that such a tag (or >>> tags) would make it easier for apps to allow the user to search in >>> their native language. It's my feeling that information gets lost by >>> translating bistro, taverne, brasserie, etc. to amenity=pub + >>> food=yes. (or amenity=restaurant). >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:38 AM, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thomas Bertels <tbert...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > A brasserie is "a small, informal restaurant that serves beer >>>> > and wine as well as simple food" >>>> > So should it be tagged as >>>> > - amenity=restaurant cuisine=brasserie (emphasis on food)? >>>> > - amenity=pub food=yes (emphasis on drinks)? >>>> > - amenity=brasserie? >>>> >>>> For me, a "brasserie" in Belgium is not a restaurant (I didn't go to a >>>> restaurant at 06:00pm to drink a beer as you can do with a "brasserie") >>>> >>>> Le 07. 08. 17 à 13:01, Marc Gemis a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> I typically tag them as amenity=restaurant. >>>> >>>> somebody create a wiki page yesterday describing your opinion as the >>>> advice to follow. >>>> If it is your edit, at least it would be useful to wait for several >>>> opinions before claiming that your opinion is the way to follow. >>>> If it isn't yours, my remark applies to the one who created it >>>> >>>>> I also add a tag restaurant:type:NL or horeca:type:NL (I know both are >>>>> bad, undocumented tags) in which I place the "type" as indicated on >>>>> the building. >>>> >>>> sorry I don't understand the mean of this tag >>>> did you mean it is like a description in one word using what's written >>>> on the wall of the building ? why not the description tag ? >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> tagg...@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be _______________________________________________ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
