There is no established way to map "kitchen-hours" at this moment AFAIK.
You could solve this with 2 nodes, one restaurant, one pub with
different opening hours, grouped together in a site relation. But if
this is the best way to do so, is debatable.

According to the wikipedia definition, I think  the izakaya could be
mapped with amenity=pub; food=yes

m.



On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Thomas Bertels <tbert...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Reposting my message from tagging:
>
> Based on https://www.lemoniteur.be/documentation/horeca-135.html it seems
> that a brasserie is a café that serves simple food, and hence the manager
> doesn't need to be a professional cook:
>
> Café
> Vous ne devez pas avoir un accès à la profession Restaurateurs et
> Traiteurs-organisateurs de banquets à condition de n'offrir que de la petite
> restauration (potages, croques et toutes sortes de toasts, croquettes, à
> l’exception de croquettes de pommes de terre, vol-au-vent, boudins noirs et
> boudins blancs, brochettes grilles, pains fourrés, hamburgers, hot-dogs,
> pittas et croissants, pâtes, pizzas, quiches ou autres tartes sales, salades
> froides, assiettes anglaises, œufs prépares, desserts (notamment des crêpes,
> des glaces, des gaufres, des gâteaux, des brioches, des yaourts et des
> milk-shakes). Ces repas légers ne peuvent être servis qu’avec du pain.
>
> This category applies too to the "restaurants" that serve only pizzas
> (pizzerias), pitas, hamburgers... except french fries ("à l’exception de
> croquettes de pommes de terre").
>
> Currently, amenity=pub food=yes seems to be the most used.
>
>
> I've noticed that some places are called "Restaurant-Brasserie", and those
> don't just serve simple foods, but also classic restaurant foods.
>
> So we should probably differentiate them based on that (at least in
> Belgium):
>
> - The "Brasserie" ones could be tagged as amenity=pub food=yes (although pub
> has an Anglo-Saxon connotation, which is to be expected given the UK origin
> of osm).
>
> - The "Restaurant-Brasserie" ones could be tagged as amenity=restaurant, but
> something is needed to specify that it's opened not just during classic
> hours (or do we just always add opening_hours?) and that we can drink
> without eating (so basically that it's also a café).
>
> In addition to brasserie, bistro and taverne, there's also izakaya in Japan.
> So I guess all of these could be tagged as amenity=pub food=yes?
>
>
> Le 8/08/2017 à 19:12, Glenn Plas a écrit :
>
> cuisine described the food served, not the restaurant type.
>
> The wiki is quite clear on that
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine
>
> So I quite agree with Marc that putting brasserie as this key's value is
> not a description of the food being served.
>
> Glenn
>
> I'm not sure whether I like the cuisine=brasserie. Do all the
> brasseries serve the same type food ? Can't you have a brasserie that
> is only serving fish dishes, or meat or vegetarian or a combination ?
> Can you expect the same food from a brasserie in Belgium and France ?
>
> as for amenity=brasserie (and amenity=tavern) I fear that is a useless
> tag, as long as the data consumers will not start using it.
> What about the Danish Kro ? should they use amenity=tavern as well ?
>
> Furthermore what is the difference between a brasserie, bistro,
> taverne, eetcafe ? (I see Thomas has an explanation for brasserie)
>
> m.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-be mailing list
> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
>

_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Reply via email to