On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Paul Norman wrote:
2. There is not a consensus among the community that CanVec data can be
imported without verifying the data for internal consistency and where
possible against imagery.
If no one disagrees with the fact there is not a consensus that importing
CanVec without minimal verification is acceptable I'll go ahead and document
on the Wiki, using Andrew Allison's examples.
+1.
Is there enough support to use the positive rather than the negative
language, ie 'There is consensus among the community that
Canvec data should only be imported when the data
elements have been verified for internal consistency/accuracy/existence with
the available imagery'
Steve
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca