What tells you he didnt prepare batches outside the upload time(offline)? Your logic is skewed
On Sep 1, 2016 8:39 AM, "Michael Reichert" <naka...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Am 2016-09-01 um 12:26 schrieb Begin Daniel: > > Furthermore, I hope you will not use you 100 objects per minute to > decide whether or not you will delete a changeset. I think this threshold > is value doesn't' apply (see below) > > > > Daniel > > > > About the100 objects threshold. > > From my experience, if I load a Canvec tile in JOSM, make all the > necessary corrections and then import the result to OSM, I throw up to 25K > objects to the database within five minutes. As far as I know, the > timestamps attached to the changeset and to the objects is generated by the > OSM database when receiving the data. The five minutes it takes to upload > the data to the database (5K objects per minute) do not reflect the time I > spent editing the data prior to the upload. > > That's the base of my calculation I did with Rps333's changesets: > > changeset start end object count > ------------------------------------------------------------ > 39517571 19:30:53 19:32:56 4311 > 39517686 19:35:30 19:41:12 11724 > 39517944 19:45:15 19:47:27 4963 > 39518147 19:53:25 20:04:55 19286 > > As you see, he took less than three minutes minutes after uploading > 39517571 to prepare 39517686. You cannot check such an amount of data > very well within that time. > > Best regards > > Michael > > > -- > Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten > ausgenommen) > I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca