To answer you question about who would organise the tasking manager, I'm
willing to do so.

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:24 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote:

> A couple of comments:
>
> 1. Pierre Beland <https://mobile.twitter.com/pierzen?p=s> has identified
> 95% of contributors only map 6% of the assets.
> https://mobile.twitter.com/pierzen/status/910551645498552321  We would
> need to use those 5% of mappers who do the most mapping and they have their
> own agendas and reasons for mapping. They are more likely to throw their
> weight behind something that looks achievable and I'm not sure this is.
>
> 2. I've put up a sample of buildings being mapped from a mapathon.
> https://www.jatws.org/johnw/building3.jpg as you can see in my opinion
> the quality is not suitable for Stats Canada's use.  Some buildings are
> grouped together with others as a single building, others are mapped the
> wrong shape or size.  Quite often buildings are omitted.  There are better
> examples and there are worse examples but it is not untypical and it was
> this experience that made me suggest the Open Data import route in the
> first place.
>
> So Open Data import is better for quality.  Adding tags to building foot
> prints is less error prone.
>
> 3. There are more than 5,000 municipal governments in Canada source Stats
> Can.  It took five years to get the City of Ottawa to update their Open
> Data license.  Treasury Board still hasn't released their Open Data tool
> kit for the municipalities.  With good will I estimate it will take two
> years to get the Open Data licenses amended.  Kingston might be a good
> target.  With any questions and there will be a number, this figure can be
> expected to drift out to three to four years.  Who is responsible to answer
> questions, in both official languages?  Who will make the requests to
> municipal governments to adopt a usable Open Data license?
>
> In Ottawa we had the right mix of resources.  We had enough local mappers
> to discuss things through which is part of the import process. We had good
> will from the City of Ottawa and they were happy to release building foot
> print data which had not been part of their Open Data so far.  The import
> process is not simple these days, it would need  the steps to follow to be
> documented and then you get the technical side of the import.  I'm a fairly
> experienced mapper and to be honest I wouldn't attempt the sort of complex
> import that was done in Ottawa.  I'm not sure the Ottawa experience is
> repeatable more than five thousand times.
>
> We can approach the OSM LWG for an opinion on existing licenses but they
> are volunteers and for five thousand opinions that would take a
> considerable amount of time and if the license weren't the TB toolkit ones
> I wouldn't even bother.
>
> The community is supposed to be doing this.  Fine but a project manager
> and a project plan might make it run more smoothly.  Data quality will be
> important so how will it be verified?  Who will be responsible for
> organising task manager tiles for the whole country? Who will identify the
> group of mappers who are "local" to a small municipality?  Remember these
> have a critical decision making role to play in the import process.
>
> Have fun.
>
> Cheerio John
>
>
> On 28 September 2017 at 16:48, Alasia, Alessandro (STATCAN) <
> alessandro.ala...@canada.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> Statistics Canada was a partner of the 2017 HOT Summit held in Ottawa,
>> Sept 14-15. In parallel to the summit, Statistics Canada hosted a workshop
>> to discuss the possibility of launching a community-led initiative titled
>> “Building Canada 2020”.
>>
>> The goal and vision of this initiative is simple: *map all buildings in
>> Canada on OSM by the year 2020*. The workshop was well attended. There
>> were about 50 people from various sectors (federal, academic, civic group,
>> and private). This was a preliminary discussion amongst a small group of
>> people, but now that broad interest has been confirmed more stakeholders
>> need to be involved!
>>
>> A short summary of the workshop along with a first draft *Roadmap to
>> implementation* has been posted on the OSM Wiki at:
>> *https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada/Building_Canada_2020*
>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada/Building_Canada_2020>
>>
>> Everyone that shares the vision of “mapping all buildings in Canada on
>> OSM by the year 2020” is invited to contribute to the discussion and the
>> roadmap to implementation. In addition, there is still need to discuss how
>> coordination, communication and governance of this initiative can be set in
>> place.
>>
>> One important aspect that needs to be emphasized is that “Building Canada
>> 2020” is not a Statistics Canada project. In fact, it is not properly a
>> project of any sort. It is a vision and an aspirational goal. The hope is
>> that many organizations and contributors working with an open data resource
>> (OSM) can coordinate their efforts through a multitude of projects,
>> initiatives, and activities towards a common goal that would benefit
>> society at large.
>>
>> My team at Statistics Canada (DEIL) has been working on a pilot project
>> with OSM (which was presented at the HOT Summit). We are looking at the
>> possibility of a second Statistics Canada project to expand to other cities
>> the work done with the pilot in Ottawa and Gatineau. If this happens, this
>> StatCan project would contribute to, and align with, the Building Canada
>> 2020 initiative. Hopefully this will be but one of many projects and
>> activities contributing to the vision. Where possible, we would be happy to
>> coordinate work with other organizations or groups that share the vision.
>> We would also be happy to share experiences and the tools developed while
>> working with building information on OSM.
>>
>> We look forward to further collaboration with the OSM communities as we
>> move forward with the second phase of our project and expand to more
>> cities.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Alessandro and DEIL Team
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>


-- 
外に遊びに行こう!
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to