> > And why is Kingston upon Thames listed as "London Borough (royal)"? > > It formally is the Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames. No idea why, > but suspect it's to do with the original charter given by the monarch > of the day in n A.D. > > OOI the list doesn't look _quite_ complete to me. Leicester should be > on there as a unitary authority (city). >
There's some London Boroughs missing I think, I can't see the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, or the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, City of Westminster, and the City of London. Maybe more I haven't checked. Either that or it's reorganised them somehow. > cheers > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
