> I could equally claim that information on the surface of paths is > absolutely essential for cyclists with road bikes, and that toilet > opening hours are absolutely essential for people with weak bladders. > In many areas OSM is completely hopeless at accurate routing for cars, > motorbikes, HGVs, but we don't stop people adding roads unless they've > got every last routing detail correct.
+1 I haven't had time to write on the tag voting document, but I did notice the for 'private' bridleway pic, I would probably tag this as a highway = service. This probably more as tag for the render, but in IMHO there's not much difference between a h=service and h=track,surface=asphalt,(or tracktype=grade1). The bonus is the service is currently rendered in Mapnik and Cyclemap etc... Sometimes I think it would be good if OSMers had more focus on aspects that *all* the other map providers don't do (especially OS). As Tom notes above, it's generally impossible even using OS maps to tell if one would like to take a road bike down a Bridleway. One doesn't really want to have to keep accessing the OSM data directly for these bits. If A N renderer or routers showed/considered such detail (as appropriate for eg road bike users, pram/wheel chair pushers, wheelchair users and various use cases) then it would be much more powerful. Also for toilets it is nice to know if they required a fee too! Be Seeing You - Rob. If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving isn't for you. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb