Hey Dan,
Dan S schrieb:
Hi all,
I went to check out a local nature reserve. It's currently in OSM as a
leisure=park. I would like to tag as leisure=nature_reserve, but this
one is indeed also a publicly accessible park, so I don't like the
idea of removing the park tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188492303
The southern end of it is closed to the public, so at the moment my
inclination is to retag the main polygon as nature_reserve, and to tag
a smaller polygon as park. Any better ideas than that?
this area is listed neither in natura2000.eea.europa.eu nor in
protectedplanet.net.
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area#Nature-protected-area>
If
=4 there would be *active* habitat-/species-management (trespassing
restrictions) ?
=5 there are longtime developed or grown and *large* areas with
interaction of people ("scenic values" - Ecology Park?)
=7 smaller area, protecting nature-features, like some vegetation ... or
for recreation (scenic values?)
It seems to me like protect_class=7
The IUCN-code gave a basic and gives an orientation for OSM, but the
protect_class doesn't reflect exact the IUCN-code.
So far its possible to add
boundary=protected_area
+ protect_class=7
+ protection_title=Ecology Park
+ name=Bow Creek Ecology Park
...
*But* in fact:
on its website the area too looks to a bigger part like a "park", with
its typical nature-recreation features.
So on the other hand again leisure=park?
regards,
tshrub
Thanks
Dan
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
