Another thought about tagging is when using JOSM what value(s) should be put in the changeset source field.
So far I've been using "FHRS" rather than the full name expansion. -- Be Seeing You - Rob. If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving isn't for you. ________________________________ From: Gregrs <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> Sent: 28 November 2016 22:15:23 To: Robert Norris Cc: Talk GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Autumn Quarterly Project Thanks Rob. I hope you don't mind me CC'ing the Talk-GB list. I've updated the wiki page [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Food_Hygiene_Rating_System] a bit but the recommendations for tagging are a bit out of date compared with what's been discussed on the list more recently. It seems generally accepted that we shouldn't add transient data such as the rating. I wonder if someone might be able to update the wiki page linked above? Rob - I'd be happy to add a link at some point once it's a bit more up to date. (I'll add a GitHub issue just to remind me!) Thanks, Greg On 28 Nov 2016, at 21:48, Robert Norris <rw_nor...@hotmail.com<mailto:rw_nor...@hotmail.com>> wrote: At the bottom of the comparison tool, is it worth adding a link back to the Wiki page - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_Food_Hygiene_Rating_System - about FHRS and the best tagging practice? I didn't think this was worth a github issue <OutlookEmoji-?.png> -- Be Seeing You - Rob. If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving isn't for you.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
