The problem with Birmingham, Glasgow and Leeds only having max. 5000 FHRS establishments is now fixed. <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/22>
Happy mapping! Greg > On 6 Nov 2016, at 14:11, Greg <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > The FHRS/OSM comparison tool <http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/> is > updating correctly again. Unfortunately I didn’t get a response from the FSA > but did manage to code a workaround, and the update script has run > successfully this morning. > > I did however notice another issue; the way the update script interacts with > the FHRS API means that currently a maximum of 5000 FHRS establishments are > returned for each FHRS authority (N.B. these don’t necessarily tally with the > OS Boundary Line districts used to create a page per district). This could > cause problems in Birmingham, Glasgow and Leeds, although these areas don’t > seem to have many FHRS IDs matched anyway. See > <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/22> for updates in due > course. > > Thanks, > Greg > > >> On 2 Nov 2016, at 10:37, Greg <gre...@fastmail.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Unfortunately the update script for the FHRS/OSM comparison tool >> <http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/> failed last night. It >> appears that there is a problem with the FHRS API, which the tool uses >> to download FHRS information. I will investigate this issue further as >> soon as possible. You can follow its progress on GitHub: >> <https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/21>. >> >> You can continue to use the tool but the data was last updated on >> Tuesday morning rather than this morning. >> >> Thanks, >> Greg _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb