Dear all,
The FHRS/OSM comparison tool <http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/
<http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/>> has some new features which should
help with the Autumn Quarterly Project
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2016_Q4_Project:_Food_Hygiene_Ratings
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2016_Q4_Project:_Food_Hygiene_Ratings>>.
*Distant matches*
There is now a table at the bottom of each district page listing those FHRS
matches for which the OSM and FHRS positions are > 500m apart. For these
matches, the overview map also has a dotted line showing the difference in
positions. N.B. OSM positions are usually more accurate as FHRS positions seem
to be reverse-geocoded from postcodes. These distant matches may therefore
indicate a problem with the FHRS data rather than OSM data, but are worth
checking.
*Duplicate fhrs:ids*
There is also a table at the bottom of each district page listing all of the
OSM entities which have an fhrs:id tag that is shared with at least one of the
OSM entities in this district. This can indicate an error, although sometimes
FHRS IDs do correspond to more than one OSM entity.
The suggested matches map no longer suggests matches using FHRS IDs that have
already been assigned to an OSM entity. (Thanks to spindr for spotting this
one.)
*Updating OSM data*
The update script now runs a bit later in the morning (after the Geofabrik OSM
extract becomes available) and thanks to some optimisations, takes much less
time to complete. The lag between updating OSM and seeing your updates appear
in the comparison tool should therefore have reduced a bit, although not
disappeared completely!
I hope you continue to enjoy using the comparison tool. As ever, please report
any bugs or feature requests on GitHub
<https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues
<https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues>>.
Thanks,
Greg
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
