Sounds sensible to me but I'm no expert. We have lots of moor here in Yorkshire Colin
Sent from TypeApp On 25 Sep 2017, 12:31, at 12:31, ael <law_ence....@ntlworld.com> wrote: >On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 10:10:07AM +0000, SK53 wrote: >> than anything they reflect that OSM as a project lacks good tags for >many >> of these boreo-temperate upland features, and whilst that is true >there > >I have been changing some "heath" areas of Dartmoor to "moor". But I >notice that the wiki claims that this is deprecated. > >Since most of these are large areas which really cover a variety of >vegetation, I can't see that any of the "established" tags are really >appropriate. "Moor" is exactly right. > >If forced to use the documentated tags, I would go for >natural = grassland;wetland as the best approximation despite the >fact that not everything is wet nor is grass. > >Of course, it only makes sense for coarse-grained approximate mapping, >and more localised accurate tags are the ideal. > >Should "moor" or something similar be restored and supported by >renderers? > >ael > >_______________________________________________ >Talk-GB mailing list >Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
