On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:51:18PM +0100, Kevin Peat wrote: > >Anyway, I take it that no one is objecting to my changes and wanting to > >revert them? > > > >ael > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Talk-GB mailing list > >Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > > This was discussed in a thread here a number of years ago. There is a lot of > upland heath on the moor: > > http://www.dartmoor.gov.uk/wildlife-and-heritage/habitats2/moorland/upland-heathland > > I think it would be better if it was kept as heath with a sub type. Just > changing it to moor doesn't add anything useful.
Thanks for the link: interesting. Now the question is: what subtype? heath=upland perhaps? I am not sure that all the areas that I modified were all "upland", although I suppose pretty well all of Dartmoor is high. I agree that moor doesn't add anything: indeed it was intended to remove incorrect information on my original narrow understanding of "heath". _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
