On 08/08/18 09:54, Lester Caine wrote:
They should be moved to OHM but then ANY information that is superseded should be automatically archived to SOMETHING since we are now in a situation where much accurately mapped material is simply dumped when there is a change to the current situation. The 'delete' process should be handled in a manor more sensitive to the hard work that has gone before!
Although it can be fiddly to access, the data is not lost. All you need is the changeset number of the deletion to be able to access the deleted data and its complete revision history.
A revertion is not a special operation in the database, so would just be recorded as a changeset deleting the objects reflecting the historic boundary.
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
