On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Frank Steggink <stegg...@steggink.org> wrote:
> Regarding the highway = unclassified tag from the AND import: this was > before my time, but I believe it was caused by a lack of granularity of the > highway types in the original data. No, the issue was an incorrect mapping of the AND highway type to the openstreetmap highway type in the original import.AND had levels 1 to 5 and no level. These should have been mapped: level 1-3: motorway, trunk, primary, secondary level 4: tertiary level 5: unclassified no level: residential but they were mapped: level 1-3: primary? level 4: secondary level 5: tertiary no level: unclassified The incorrect secondary and tertiary roads have later been corrected in a partially automated manner - roads that had not been touched were changed automatically, after which the rest was done by manual clean up of the map. The unclassifed-should-be-residentials have not been so corrected. I think that the lack of a difference in the way it is shown on Mapnik has been working against them being handled by users on large scale. -- André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Talk-nl mailing list Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
