On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: > > network=us_i_2 # Interstate (2 digit) us_i_3 for 3 digit > network=us_us_2 # US Route us_us_3 for 3 digit > network=us_ny # NY State Route > network=us_ny_county # > > That looks great to me, except that us_i_2 vs us_i_3 seems like tagging > for the renderer, and something that would be easy for the renderer to > figure out. What about us_i and then have renderers find the right > shield for the number of digits?
I agree with this but suspect that Richard did that for the sake of simplicity in his altered code. Adam _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us