On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Ian Dees <ian.d...@gmail.com> wrote: >> How much of that is there, anyway? > > Look at the TIGER edited map. There is *lots* of untouched TIGER data in > OSM: > http://open.mapquestapi.com/tigerviewer/index.html?zoom=9&lat=40.07546&lon=-76.329999&layers=B
At the risk of being accused of blatant self-promotion, I would also like to point to a blog post I wrote on the subject. It does exactly as Mike N suggested, looking at the last editor of a way and determining if it was automated or not. It is similar in spirit to the TIGER edited map but aggregates the data on a county-by-county level. http://ksmapper.blogspot.com/2010/11/nationwide-tiger-map.html One bug I was recently made aware of on IRC is that edits that were made after the initial import but before the "un-abbreviator" aren't being taken into account. I will try to fix that and post a new map. But yes, at the end of the day, there are a LOT of untouched TIGER ways in OSM and I think a lot of them could benefit from being updated with newer data. Toby _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us