On 13 January 2012 22:50, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:44:30PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote: > >> I do that too. There is of course a small chance of the decliner >> changing his or her mind, so I only delete data that is tainted by a >> decliner that I have personally been in touch with about the license >> change and my best judgement is that his / her decision is final. > > Speaking of, has anyone talked to balrog-kun yet? I know he was at > one point insanely prolific and I often stumble across his data, he's > currently a decliner.
I'm balrog-kun, if you see my data in the US you can add odbl=clean* because I haven't used any non-ODbL sources outside of Europe. But I have used such sources in Europe and so (Richard Weait says..) this is not compatible with CT 1.2.4. This is not the main reason I have declined CT, but in any case all of my own work is ODbL compatible and me saying that probably has more legal value than a half-automatic click-through.. well, unless I'm not balrog-kun, but then I couldn't have put it on the user page. I'm not in Oregon these days which is why no new data is appearing from me. Cheers * provided other authors in the history also license their contributions ODbL, which old LWG minutes say is *not* implied by CT acceptance. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
