On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Phil! Gold <phi...@pobox.com> wrote: > * Chris Lawrence <lordsu...@gmail.com> [2012-04-03 10:21 -0400]: >> I think concurrencies might look better stacked vertically in some >> circumstances... you'd have to have some logic about the underlying >> direction of the way to make that happen, but vertical stacking would >> look nicer on N-S ways I think. >> >> Compare: >> http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=14&lat=37.13887&lon=-80.34525&layers=B0 >> and >> http://elrond.aperiodic.net/shields/?zoom=14&lat=37.19653&lon=-80.22878&layers=B0 > > Try those URLs agan and let me know if you like the way it looks now. > Most of the map still has to rerender (and I'm focusing the server on > putting Interstates on the low zoom levels at the moment), but the areas > around those links should be up to date.
Wow. Vertical pairs. Looks nice, and switches back to horizontal as the line orientation changes. :-) _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
