I'd like to start with California and Arizona (70 nodes),
and add notes where on-site survey is needed to exactly align to the OSM
base layer.

What's different about this import is that armchair mappers can get only so
far, verifying press releases and such.  The features are too small to spot
even on the best available air photos (e.g. better than the Bing ones).
Even the street cameras are not generally enough: this really takes in
person spotting.

Any more comment / objection?



On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote:

> To summarize: a proposed import of of bicycle repair stations. The
>  database is maintained by a vendor of bicycle repair stations, the data
> quality is spot on in many cases, and "geocoding level" in other cases with
> the pins generally in the right area.   The stations are too small to
> find on an air photo, but frequently do appear in press releases than be
> found with a search engine.
>
> The vendor uses OSM as a base map:
> http://www.dero.com/fixitmap/fixitmap.html
> The discussion is on the imports list.
> The data is at:
> http://www.dero.com/fixitmap/fixitmap.html
> Discussion centers on how best to improve the inexact pin locations.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to