On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Minh Nguyen <m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us> wrote:
> On 2015-03-31 00:36, Frederik Ramm wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 03/31/2015 08:04 AM, Natfoot wrote: >> >>> There is so many situations where to his naked eye on the ground he may >>> not be able to see it. To a person like myself I can still find the >>> signs on the earth of where the railroad once was. >>> >> >> Then map the signs that *are*, but not the railroad which - as you >> correctly say - once *was*. >> > > For many rights of way, the main remaining feature is a greenway cutting > across farmland -- something you can easily armchair map, even. Personally, > I'd rather map that ROW as a railway=abandoned way than as a natural=wood > area, just as I avoid mapping roads as areas. On the ground, meanwhile, > you'd tend to find no trespassing signs on railbanked ROWs, no? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330316713 Yep! Mapped that back in March 2015. These are significant navigation features, if it rendered. The desert will preserve these features for years. It is also a feature that should not be moved into OSH. Perhaps copied but not moved. Regards, Greg
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us