> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tristan Scott > To: Frederik Ramm > Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 4:32 PM > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Voting: traffic_enforcement > > > Hmm. noting the comments on votes about tag highway it seems that it would > be a better scheme to use "traffic_enforcement=speed" instead of both > "highway=traffic_enforcement" AND "enforcement_type=speed" > > Now - this isn't my proposal, I'm just rather keen and willing to try to > help. > What's the correct procedure now to change this sort of thing? > > Do we need to stop this proposal, construct a new one and RFC it before > voting again (in a month's time!) > Or could we, for example, clear the votes, modify the proposal and request > votes again? > Or, given this isn't my proposal, should I keep my nose out? :) > > It strikes me that good suggestions like this can't be handled by the vote > system, and don't seem to get picked up at the RFC stage... so you end up > knowing what the "best" solution is, yet approving something that isn't > it. > > Tristan >
I'm all for clearing the votes, rewriting the proposal, and then voting on the new proposal in say a week. All except one of the votes was made today, presumably in response to your earlier posting, so it might be safe to assume that those who have already approved the tagging read this mailing list and will see the proposal is being changed. David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
