Hi,

Ulf Lamping wrote:
> "We're only loosing 5% of the 
> data" is a very, very strange attitude for me. Not because of the data 
> but because of the people behind that data.

Well, we always said "we have unlimited free labour" ,-)

> But I just won't continue to spend effort if OSM in 
> the long run probably ends up as a commercial thing.

The idea that the new license is somehow paving the way for OSM to "end 
up as a commercial thing" is utterly wrong, and whoever claims this 
should be hit over the head with a large cluebat.

However the fact that there seem to more such people than cluebats tells 
us that somewhere there's a lesson to be learned about communication. It 
seems that the new license effort, so far, has been a prime example of 
how *not* to do it.

Bye
Frederik


_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to