Richard Fairhurst wrote: >Sent: 03 March 2009 2:55 PM >To: talk@openstreetmap.org >Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] License plan > > >Pieren wrote: >> It's very confusing now about who, how and what is deleted with >> the license change. I would appreciate if someone could answer >> the following questions: > >It's not been decided. What do you think should happen? > >Everything is up for debate. ODbL itself is up for debate. As Jordan >(co-author) said on odc-discuss earlier re: a point we raised: "It (like >the >rest of the ODbL) isn't set in stone and so totally open for discussion." > >Really, there's no evil force presenting a fait accompli here. ><brokenrecord>There is no "you" or "them", only "us".</brokenrecord>
Its about time you added that tag to Map Features ;-) > >cheers >Richard >-- >View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/License-plan- >tp22245532p22310154.html >Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >_______________________________________________ >talk mailing list >talk@openstreetmap.org >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.6/1980 - Release Date: 03/02/09 >23:02:00 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
