On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Shalabh <shalab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Liz <ed...@billiau.net> wrote: > >> On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Shalabh wrote: >> > While I am not advocating a fork (I am anyway voting a yes to ODBL), I >> dont >> > think a single community is always the answer. Single communities tend >> to >> > get static for the lack of competition. All successful open source >> projects >> > have parallels, whether through forking or because of different organic >> > origins. So I dont think if OSM has a parallel because of forking, it >> would >> > be bad. Gives people more choices to choose from and thats what freedom >> is >> > all about. >> >> Honestly I'm happy to have GoogleMap as the competitor. >> > > Sorry, google is anyway not the only competitor. > Nor are they a competitor in the first place.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
