On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Robert Martinez <m...@mray.de> wrote: > If you are missing the geodata - what about the community aspect to the > project? is it less impoprtant? > There are tons of things that should be represented, too (maybe even > harder to integrate than geodata). > I chose to stick to the basic aspect of marking things on a map - in > order to find what you want, and don't expect from every designer to go > for the same approach.
I like the logo - it really looks great. But I think there could be more "OSM"-ness to it. How about something cute like a person standing on a map, drawing a line? The essence to capture is not so much that "this is a digital map" or "there is a community behind this map" but "this map is being made by people". One person would be sufficient to represent that. Anyway, like I said I like your first draft, but any logo process inevitably involves many iterations, with lots of feedback. It would be naïve to think one person can, in one iteration, produce *the* logo that everyone likes. Steve _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
