On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 01:08 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > David Murn wrote: > > What about if you become aware that once youve got someone, who has > > agreed and who has contributed tainted data? Will you (or someone else > > wielding the magical OSMF+3 wand) reverse it? > > If data is "tainted" in a way that makes in incompatible with the > currently used license then it will have to be removed in order not to > put the project at risk (e.g. data copied from proprietary sources). > This is independent of the license change.
This was a question in regards to whether you will reverse the selection of someone accepting the new licence/terms, if you (or they) become aware the data is tainted. You clearly stated in your previous email that once the user has accepted there is no way to change the decision to decline, then here say that if that situation came up that it would have to be done. Is there anyone here who can answer these questions the same in sequential emails? While this isnt a licence specific question, its a question specific to the thread at hand about users accepting or declining to have their edits released under the new licence/terms. David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
