Johnwhelan is the account name. Unfortunately I have made a fair number of edits. The concern is I'm not comfortable that all of these meet the new standard but I'm unsure which ones do and which don't. I'm happy to reenter data following the new guidelines. I'm not happy to have some one else say don't worry about it.
Thanks John On 15 April 2011 03:55, Grant Slater <openstreet...@firefishy.com> wrote: > On 15 April 2011 00:38, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>If data is "tainted" in a way that makes in incompatible with the > currently > >> used license then it will have to be removed in order not to put the > project > >> at risk (e.g. data copied from proprietary sources). This is independent > of > >> the license change. > > > > I assume that the currently used license means to the ODBL license now in > > use by contributors. If so how and to whom do I serve notice that even > > though I clicked on the accept button I'm not comfortable that all my > edits > > before March 2011 contain only data is that is completely untainted so > > rather than put the OSM project at risk could they be removed. I'm happy > to > > get out my GPS and notepad and ensure anything I add from today forward > will > > meet the new criteria. > > > > Hi John, > > What is your OSM account name? Where did the imported data come from: > government source, printed map, something else? > > Regards > Grant >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
