On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 6:10 PM, 80n <80n...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:35 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> As far as I understand this, we would then have all the cons of >> cc-by-sa (e.g. that some mayor mapping company could "rip us off") > > Show us the evidence to back up this assertion please.
It's not just without evidence, it's logically nonsensical. If CC-BY-SA doesn't apply to OSM, then there's no harm in using it. If OSM is public domain, then slapping ODbL on top of it doesn't magically make it proprietary. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
