On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Chris Jones <roller...@sucs.org> wrote: > On 15/06/11 14:41, Richard Weait wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Chris Jones <roller...@sucs.org> wrote: >>> It seems a bit backward to block my new contributions just because >>> nobody got around to talking to the OS folks yet... >> There have been several attempts to engage with OS, if I remember >> correctly, both by LWG and by individual mappers. They've been >> resistant. >> >> Sorry to appear to be picking on you, Chris, I know you aren't the >> only one. What seems backward to me is deciding to use a previously >> and famously "verboten" source for your edits without being perfectly >> clear that those edits are now permitted. > > A fair point, however at the time it was clear... since then the new CTs > have complicated things. > > A relativity small number of my edits made use of OS Open data so it > wouldn't be too much effort for me to replace any effected objects from > survey or bing imagery but im loathed to do so until someone (the LWG?) > can tell me one way or the other.
Perhaps additional contacts from the community can inspire OS to respond? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
