David Murn <da...@incanberra.com.au> writes: > On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:16 -0500, Toby Murray wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 PM, David Murn <da...@incanberra.com.au> wrote: >> > when all the nearmap-derived data is removed >> >> It seems like you missed an email a couple of days ago? >> >> Current NearMap derived data does not need to be removed from OSM >> during the license change. > > It sounds like you mis-read the email. > > It does not 'need' to be removed, NearMap have simply said it CAN be > relicenced, depending on the user who derived the data. > > Unless a user can guarantee that their edits were 100% based on nearmap > and used no other CC source (unlikely for Australian users), they cant > accept the CTs, which means all their edits must be removed.
Wasn't there a requirement to attribute Nearmap derived data? Where that has been done the data could be saved. Matthias _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
