On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Serge Wroclawski <emac...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The problem here is that without "another side" there can be no "consensus".
> You are saying that the opinion of one contributor > doing 1000 edits is more important than the opinion of 1000 > contributors doing 1 edit. Please don't speak for me. I said that you can't get consensus from idle accounts. > I like David's idea with the specific tag "name:disputed". The status of Jerusalem as part of Israel is not disputed except by the same sort of people who might say that London is not the capital of the UK. The fact that some people don't like the situation doesn't change that. A "disputed" tag will result in many things being marked disputed. I can think of a bunch even in the US. - Serge _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
